On Recruiting

Summary

Naval Ravikant and Nivi have an extensive conversation on why recruiting is the single most important thing a founder does and why it cannot be delegated. Naval argues that the early people in a company are its DNA — they determine the culture, the standard of work, and the quality of everyone who comes after them. The moment a founder stops personally recruiting and managing everyone is the moment the company starts to change in ways they cannot control. The best people truly only want to work with the best, and any weak link on the team creates a cognitive load that drives top performers away.

The discussion covers practical recruiting tactics (breaking every rule to get the best people, not hiring for roles but collecting geniuses), the dangers of scaling too fast (middle management, Slack as an asymmetric time-waster, the principal-agent problem), and what separates great teams from good ones. Naval introduces the concept of “primus inter pares” — first among equals — where multi-disciplinary team members each hold authority in their domain of greatest taste. He and Nivi dive deep into the difference between 10,000 hours and 10,000 iterations, arguing that learning comes from rapid feedback loops against nature and free markets, not from raw time spent.

The episode covers the founder’s personality as the company itself, why good teams throw away far more product than they keep, why all new information starts as misinformation, and concludes with Naval’s current philosophy: “curate people” and maintain a “geniuses only” hiring bar. The core message is that the prime directive of a startup is to never compromise on talent.

Highlights

”The Best Only Want to Work With the Best”

“The best people truly only want to work with the best people. Working with anyone who’s not at their level is a cognitive load upon them. And the more people they’re surrounded by who are not as good as they are, the more keenly they’re aware that they belong somewhere else.” — Naval Ravikant, 0:35

yt-dlp --download-sections "*0:35-2:30" "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8x978NnZSI" --force-keyframes-at-cuts --merge-output-format mp4 -o "best-want-to-work-with-best.mp4"

”The Random Interview Test”

“Walk into that room where the rest of the team is sitting, take anyone you want, pick them at random, pull them aside for 30 minutes and interview them. And if you aren’t impressed by them, don’t join. When you do that test, you will instinctively flinch at the idea of them interviewing randomly a certain person that’s kind of in the back of your mind. That’s the person you need to let go.” — Naval Ravikant, 2:30

yt-dlp --download-sections "*2:30-3:10" "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8x978NnZSI" --force-keyframes-at-cuts --merge-output-format mp4 -o "random-interview-test.mp4"

”Break Every Rule to Get the Best People”

“Every single hire we had to break some core rule of recruiting. We break all the objections around commuting, we’ll break the objections around, oh, I’m having a kid, we’ll break the objections around, oh, I can’t afford to exercise these options.” — Naval Ravikant, 7:08

yt-dlp --download-sections "*7:08-9:00" "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8x978NnZSI" --force-keyframes-at-cuts --merge-output-format mp4 -o "break-every-rule-recruiting.mp4"

”Geniuses Only”

“My cofounder and I have a new criterion in our company: geniuses only. It’s a harsh word, but it sets a very high bar. And then you can just look around for who’s not a genius.” — Naval Ravikant, 40:41

yt-dlp --download-sections "*40:41-41:51" "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8x978NnZSI" --force-keyframes-at-cuts --merge-output-format mp4 -o "geniuses-only.mp4"

”All New Information Starts as Misinformation”

“Remember, all new information starts as misinformation. It starts as not being obviously true and so it’s accused of being misinformation. Eventually over time it’s proven right or wrong and if it’s right then it’s information you can then build upon.” — Naval Ravikant, 38:31

yt-dlp --download-sections "*38:31-39:07" "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8x978NnZSI" --force-keyframes-at-cuts --merge-output-format mp4 -o "new-info-starts-as-misinfo.mp4"

”Practice Your Craft at the Edge of Your Capability”

“I will delete tweets that have 10,000 likes on them because I catch a grammar or spelling error or I think of a better way to formulate it. And I’ll just kill it. I don’t care about the views, because I want it to be done just right.” — Naval Ravikant, 45:00

yt-dlp --download-sections "*45:00-47:14" "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8x978NnZSI" --force-keyframes-at-cuts --merge-output-format mp4 -o "practice-craft-at-edge.mp4"

Key Points

• Recruiting is non-delegable (0:35) - Founders can delegate everything except recruiting, fundraising, strategy, and product vision
• Early hires are DNA (0:35) - The first people define the company’s culture and quality standard; when you outsource recruiting, the company is no longer driven by you
• Best people want the best (0:35) - Top performers experience working with weaker teammates as cognitive load that signals they should leave
• The random interview test (2:30) - Tell candidates to interview any random team member; the person you flinch about is the one to let go
• Intelligence, energy, integrity, low-ego (3:14) - Buffett’s criteria plus low-ego; you can manage 30-40 low-ego people but only 5 high-ego ones
• You can never hire better than yourself (6:00) - Early on, all you bring is you; people better than you won’t work for you long
• Break every rule (7:08) - Best people don’t fit neat boxes; you must be creative on comp, location, title, role, hours
• Primus inter pares (9:18) - First among equals; multi-disciplinary people whose peers recognize their domain expertise
• No Slack (10:18) - Group chat creates asymmetric ability to waste others’ time; degenerates into noise
• Undiscovered talent over pedigreed hires (10:18) - Recruit through audacious missions, not by competing for the same people everyone wants
• Founder’s personality is the company (30:37) - Your principles, non-negotiables, and values dictate who you hire
• Peter Thiel’s test (34:26) - “What important truth do very few people agree with you on?” tests if someone generates their own ideas
• 10,000 iterations, not 10,000 hours (36:05) - Learning speed depends on iteration loops (do, test, learn, change), not raw time
• Good teams throw away most product (38:11) - Resistance to trying new things is the biggest scaling challenge; learning involves failure
• Idea maze (39:07) - Startups navigate left turns, backtracks, and dead ends; competitors can never catch up because the startup is deeper in the maze
• Geniuses only (40:41) - Set an impossibly high bar; if someone’s not a genius, don’t hire them
• Burnout means you want to quit (42:13) - Burnout usually signals working on the wrong thing, not needing a break
• Fun is learning at the edge (43:59) - David Deutsch: when you’re having fun, you’re learning at the edge of your capability
• Curate people (49:07) - The two-word summary: curate people; only work with geniuses, self-motivated, low-ego builders
• Collect geniuses, don’t fill roles (50:06) - If you find a genius who doesn’t fill any current need, hire them anyway

Mentions

Companies

• AngelList (43:59) - Naval’s previous company; anecdote about hiring consultants
• Impossible Inc. (implied) - Naval’s current company where “geniuses only” is the motto

Products & Technologies

• Slack (10:18) - Group chat platform Naval’s current company refuses to use
• Twitter/X (45:00) - Naval’s medium for high-density aphorisms

People

• Vinod Khosla (0:00) - “The team you build is the company you build”
• Warren Buffett (3:14) - Intelligence, energy, integrity criteria for hiring
• Steve Jobs (5:02) - Rare founder who held product vision entirely in his head
• Elon Musk (5:02) - Another rare founder who combines all four non-delegable roles
• Peter Thiel (34:26) - “What important truth do very few people agree with you on?”
• Mike Maples (35:24) - “Non-consensus and right” investing framework
• Malcolm Gladwell (36:00) - Popularized 10,000 hours; directionally correct but misleading
• Balaji Srinivasan (39:07) - Concept of the “idea maze”
• David Deutsch (43:59) - “When you’re having fun, you’re learning at the edge of your capability”

Surprising Quotes

“When you outsource recruiting, when you have other people hiring and interviewing and making hiring decisions without your direct involvement and veto, that’s a sad day. That’s the day that the company’s no longer being driven directly by you.” — Naval Ravikant, 0:35

“Good investors certainly are not going to back a company where there’s a proxy fundraiser, which is why companies that raise money through bankers are always starting off on the wrong foot.” — Naval Ravikant, 4:01

“The real geniuses are incredibly idiosyncratic. They don’t resemble each other. You cannot fit them into a box.” — Naval Ravikant, 51:11

“Generally when someone says, ‘I’m burnt out,’ I just read that as, ‘I want to quit,’ even if they don’t necessarily realize that themselves.” — Naval Ravikant, 42:13

“I will delete tweets that have 10,000 likes on them because I catch a grammar or spelling error or I think of a better way to formulate it. And I’ll just kill it.” — Naval Ravikant, 45:00

Transcript

Nivi: 0:00 This is Nivi and you’re listening to the Naval podcast. Today we’re going to be talking about recruiting, hiring, team, and culture. There’s a famous quote from Vinod Khosla: ‘The team you build is the company you build.’ Or in other words, they told you it was a technology game when it’s really a recruiting game. So, I pulled up a tweet from Naval from August 2025: ‘Founders can delegate everything except recruiting, fundraising, strategy, and product vision.’

Naval Ravikant: 0:35 Recruiting is the most important thing, because you need creativity, you need motivated people. Ideally, the early people are all geniuses. They’re self-managing, low ego, hardworking, highly competent builders, technical, maybe one or two sellers. But you can’t watch everything, you can’t micromanage everything. The early people are the DNA of the company. When you outsource recruiting, when you have other people hiring and interviewing and making hiring decisions without your direct involvement and veto, that’s a sad day. That’s the day that the company’s no longer being driven directly by you. There’s now a fly-by-wire element in between. There’s some mechanical linkage going through another human, often at a distance, and other people are not going to have the same level of selectivity that you will as a founder. The important size at which a company starts changing is not some arbitrary number like 20 or 30 or 40. It’s the point at which the founder is not directly recruiting and managing everyone. The moment that there are middle layers of management, then you are somewhat disconnected from the company and your ability to directly drive a product team that can take the company from zero to one goes away. So, we really cannot outsource recruiting. People think you can. They hire recruiters, for example. Maybe you can outsource a little bit of sourcing, but I would even argue that’s difficult. The reason recruiting is so, so, so important, and a lot of it is obvious, I’ll skip the obvious reasons, but one non-obvious reason is that the best people truly only want to work with the best people. Working with anyone who’s not at their level is a cognitive load upon them. And the more people they’re surrounded by who are not as good as they are, the more keenly they’re aware that they belong somewhere else or they should be doing their own thing. The best teams are mutually motivated. They reinforce each other. Everyone is trying to impress each other.

Naval Ravikant: 2:30 One good test is, when you’re recruiting a new person, you should be able to say to them: ‘Walk into that room where the rest of the team is sitting, take anyone you want, pick them at random, pull them aside for 30 minutes and interview them. And if you aren’t impressed by them, don’t join.’ When you do that test, you will instinctively flinch at the idea of them interviewing randomly a certain person that’s kind of in the back of your mind. That’s the person you need to let go, because that’s the person keeping you from having this high functioning team.

Naval Ravikant: 3:00 team that all wants to impress each other. That’s the bar you have to keep, especially for all the people you’re going to directly manage, the first 20, the first 30, the first 40, the first 10, whatever that number is.

Nivi: 3:10 In those early people that you’re going to directly manage, what are you looking for?

Naval Ravikant: 3:14 There’s the old Warren Buffett line of intelligence, energy, integrity, and I would add low-ego. Low-ego people are just much easier to manage, they tend to engage less in interpersonal conflict, they care more about the work than about politicking or fighting for credit. You just scale better.

Naval Ravikant: 3:29 You’ll be able to manage 30 or 40 low-ego people, when you might only be able to manage five high-ego people, because you’re always massaging their ego.

Naval Ravikant: 3:38 So, I think Nivi’s phrase is absolutely correct: the team you build is the company you build, especially for the first n people that you are directly managing. They are the DNA of the company.

Naval Ravikant: 3:48 Back to the tweet. You can’t outsource fundraising, because investors are betting on you. If you’re outsourcing fundraising, whoever you’re outsourcing to is really the person running the company.

Naval Ravikant: 4:01 Good investors certainly are not going to back a company where there’s a proxy fundraiser, which is why companies that raise money through bankers are always starting off on the wrong foot. You shouldn’t need a banker to raise money for you.

Naval Ravikant: 4:16 Now, in later rounds it’s a little different because you’re reaching money that’s outside of the normal venture market, but especially in early stage, if you’re engaging a banker, that’s symptomatic of a deeper problem.

Naval Ravikant: 4:27 Strategy: you have to set and communicate the strategy. Product vision, this is the one that’s up for debate. There are some founders who outsource product vision, but I would argue that because your job here is to take the best team you can find and distill their energy into a perfect product, to instantiate their knowledge and creativity into a product.

Naval Ravikant: 4:47 You need to unify the product vision. One person needs to hold any complex product entirely in their head. And this is where it helps to have more than one founder, because it’s rare that someone can fundraise and recruit and hold product vision entirely in their head.

Naval Ravikant: 5:02 Steve Jobs was one of these people, Elon Musk is probably another one. But usually you see a two-person team: one person who’s better at selling, although it helps if they have some builder background so they know what they’re talking about, and one person who’s better at building, but it helps if they have a little bit of a seller bone because they’re probably going to be recruiting the other builders.

Naval Ravikant: 5:22 I don’t think you can outsource any of those four. There are cases where product vision has been outsourced, there’s some brilliant person underneath who’s driving the product vision, but those are rare. Usually all four are handled by the core founding team.

Nivi: 5:33 There will never be a better recruiter in the company than the founder, and I mean that in two ways. One, in any successful startup, the founder is always a great recruiter. But there’s also the flip side of that, which is the quality of the founder as a recruiter, as a human being, or as a contributor, is a cap on the quality of anybody you’re going to bring into the organization. You’re never going to be able to hire anybody who’s better than you are, right? People say

Naval Ravikant: 6:00 hire people who are better than you. I don’t think that really works. People who are better than you don’t want to work for you for long. Now, it maybe different down the road when you’ve built a huge enterprise and there’s a network effect and an amazing product, then maybe you can hire people who are better than you because you’re bringing a lot more than just you. But early on, all you’re bringing to the startup is you. And for people to want to work for you, you have to be at least on their level. This is why I think early stage investors judge the founding team so heavily. They don’t even care about early progress, at least the good ones don’t, or about partnerships or domain expertise. They just want to see how good you are. And the clearest way you can show how good you are is by recruiting great people.

Nivi: 6:44 Another reason you can’t outsource recruiting is that recruiting takes a tremendous amount of creativity. Otherwise, you’re going to be doing the same cookie cutter stuff that every other company in the world is doing and you’re going to end up with the same interchangeable talent every other company has. So don’t take the fact that you don’t know anything about recruiting as a negative.

Naval Ravikant: 7:08 Absolutely. In my own most recent company, I think I’ve recruited the best team I’ve ever worked with by far. And we broke so many rules. Every single hire we had to break some core rule of recruiting. I won’t go into all of them because some of those are still tricks that are valid in the environment. Some of those are probably pushing boundaries. But we break every rule. We break all the objections around commuting, we’ll break the objections around, oh, I’m having a kid, we’ll break the objections around, oh, I can’t afford to exercise these options, we’ll break the objections around, oh, but I’m at a university, we’ll even break the objections around people who may have goals like, oh, I want to be surrounded by the best scientists or I want to work in a different kind of environment. In the 2025 environment, everyone is trying so hard to recruit AI people and engineers. The demand for top-level engineers is higher than ever because they’re so leveraged through the new tools. And you can just see that in the salary offers that are going out to the top people. You just have to be incredibly creative. You just have to break rules. This is another reason why you can’t outsource recruiting because when you outsource it, you’re outsourcing to someone else who doesn’t know what rules they can break and what they can’t. They’re HR or they’re afraid that they’ll break some rule that you’re not going to be happy with them breaking. But as a founder, you can break rules around the cap table. You might be giving a certain amount of stock to each employee, but one might come along for whom you have to break the rules or you have to convince them why you can’t break the rules for them or you have to structure their stock compensation a different way or the salary in a certain way or their start date or their hours or their location or their title or who they’re working with or who they’re reporting to or what their office is like or who they get to hire or what say they get to have in what part of the product or in what part of the company or how they get to straddle roles across different parts of the company. You’re going to have to break rules to get the best people because the best people are not cogs in a machine. They don’t fit into a neat and c…

Naval Ravikant: 9:00 …comfortable place. They’re multi-disciplinary and they have to temporarily don an identity of, “Oh, I’m an electrical engineer. I’m a software engineer. I’m a marketer. I’m a product manager. Whatever.”

Naval Ravikant: 9:12 But the great people are capable of anything. They chose to specialize in a particular thing, but their input is valuable everywhere.

Naval Ravikant: 9:18 And they’re respected by a group of peers. My co-founder has a phrase he likes to use from Latin, primus inter pares, first among equals, where they’re all peers, but each person, given their expertise and their particular know-how, is acknowledged by the others as being the first among equals in a given domain.

Naval Ravikant: 9:39 So one person might be better at naming and branding. One person might be better at industrial design. Another person might be better at electrical engineering or software engineering or have taste in a different domain.

Naval Ravikant: 9:51 But the great team will have multi-disciplinary people who are each capable of doing many jobs, but are specialized and have extreme taste and judgment in particular areas, and their peers are smart enough to recognize where they have that taste and will confer upon them the ability to make decisions in that area.

Naval Ravikant: 10:07 You have to break the rules, not just on recruiting, but also on operating the company and how it’s structured. Every good company is idiosyncratic. Its culture is unique to it. You can’t just transplant it.

Naval Ravikant: 10:18 To give you an example, at my latest company, we don’t use Slack, which is one of these group chat platforms. And especially in a small company, Slack just becomes a hangout spot. It’s kind of like email.

Naval Ravikant: 10:29 In email, it’s too easy to generate tasks for large groups of other people. I can fire off an email with 20 to-dos for other people, and it takes me five seconds to generate that email. And then it takes up the day of the other people trying to respond to it.

Naval Ravikant: 10:43 It creates this asymmetric ability to waste other people’s time. Over time, email has degenerated into a medium where there’s very low signal and a lot of noise, aka spam. Even well-meaning spam from friends, family, and coworkers.

Naval Ravikant: 10:57 So we all switched to text messaging, where we understand the barrier to entry is higher. Like, if you’re going to text me, it better be important. And if you’re texting me a lot and it’s not that important, I’m probably going to mute you.

Naval Ravikant: 11:10 Or if you’re in a group text and someone starts messaging too much, you exit the group text, which is why all these large group texts die out over time, because the good people mute them and leave.

Naval Ravikant: 11:20 Slack and group messaging platforms have a similar dynamic where over time they degenerate into a combination of people asking random questions in the thin air, people prognosticating, people politicking, people bickering, people talking about stuff that is not germane to the work.

Naval Ravikant: 34:26 There’s a lot of ways people try to assess whether someone has the ability to create new knowledge. Peter Thiel has his famous question, ‘What important truth do very few people agree with you on?’ He’s trying to find out if that person has opinions of their own.

Naval Ravikant: 36:05 It implies that if you spend 10,000 hours doing something you get mastery. Let’s put aside whether 10,000 is the right number or not. It’s not just hours put in, it’s iterations. How many learning loops do you have that drive the learning curve?

Naval Ravikant: 36:21 What is an iteration? An iteration is when you do something and then you look at the result, you test the result somehow, ideally against a free market or nature or physics, and then you ask what part of this experiment worked or not, and then based on that, you make a new creative guess on how to improve that thing and you do it again.

Naval Ravikant: 36:41 The number of times you can do that rotation, that iteration, the faster you’re going to learn. That’s the curve you want to be on. Great people will distill insights from every iteration.

Naval Ravikant: 38:31 Remember, all new information starts as misinformation. It starts as not being obviously true and so it’s accused of being misinformation. Eventually over time it’s proven right or wrong and if it’s right then it’s information you can then build upon.

Naval Ravikant: 40:41 My cofounder and I have a new criterion in our company: geniuses only. It’s a harsh word, but it sets a very high bar. And then you can just look around for who’s not a genius. The only way you’re going to attract geniuses, whatever that term means to you, is by having a company full of geniuses. And if someone’s not a genius, then either you’re transitioning into the phase where you can no longer hire geniuses and you just need to scale up for whatever reason, or you just need to show that person the door because you hired them prematurely for the kind of company you’re trying to build.

Naval Ravikant: 43:59 David Deutsch would say something like, ‘When you’re having fun, you’re learning at the edge of your capability to learn.’ If you are not having fun, what does that mean? You’re not getting anything new, you’re not learning. If it’s anxiety-inducing, what does that mean? That means beyond your capability. So if you are operating at the edge of your capability, you’re in flow. You’re learning, you’re doing.

Naval Ravikant: 45:00 being stressed enough for it to be interesting but not so stressed that you’re anxious. And it’s fun. It may not be fun moment to moment, but when you look back day to day, week to week, month to month, it is fun. What else would you rather be doing than practicing your craft at the highest level of capability at your edge? And so I do think the fun criterion applies to business and to jobs. For example, at my most recent company, the designers are obsessed with design to the point where we’re getting a new office space, it’s not their job to design it, nobody asked them to design it, we probably didn’t even want them to design it, they can’t help but design it down to a T. It’s meticulous. Similarly, I asked them for a book in which we could just collect various checkpoints along the way of the work that we’re doing, the people that we have, they’re designing their own bookbinding. They got their own printer to print it on special paper. They’re obsessive. They can’t 80% design something. I will delete tweets that have 10,000 likes on them because I catch a grammar or spelling error or I think of a better way to formulate it. And I’ll just kill it. I don’t care about the views, because I want it to be done just right. People make fun of me on Twitter sometimes because I’ll put out a tweet, then I’ll change my mind and I’ll delete it after it’s gotten a lot of traction and I’ll reverse the order of two words or I’ll change one word. Then I’ll wake up the next morning, past the edit window, and I decide I like the original ones and I’ll post the original ones back up and I’ve lost all the virality and all the momentum, but I don’t care. I don’t want to be associated with a slipshod statement. It has to be correct and incompressible. It has to say something true to me in an interesting way. And that’s more important, that the art is correct, than that it’s popular.

Nivi: 47:14 Yeah, there’s an old quote that people who are not good at their jobs, you ask them to do something, they try and do it, and then you have to check their work. The best people, you ask them to do something and they come back with something that you never could have come up with yourself and never could have imagined.

Naval Ravikant: 47:31 It’s high agency people, founder mode, whatever you want to call it. But it’s people who take responsibility for doing the job the best way possible. You just have to communicate to them what it is that you think needs to be done. And it’s not just communication. Communication is a management thing. It’s a leadership thing. So you also have to motivate them, not in some cheesy rah-rah way, but to help them understand the insight you have as to why you think it’s so important. And if you think it’s really important, then it’s your job to persuade them.

Nivi: 48:47 If I was going to sum up this whole conversation, the prime directive of a startup is to never compromise on talent. I would rather take a short-term hit on customer experience than take a short or long-term hit on the quality of the team.

Naval Ravikant: 49:07 I would summarize it in two words: curate people. And the philosophy that I have going forward in my current company and all subsequent ones is that I only want to work with geniuses. I only want to work with self-motivated people. I only want to work with low ego people. I only want to work with people who are builders and engineers and artists and are at the top of their craft. And that’s all there is to it. You just have to be willing to curate people. We haven’t talked about firing, by the way, but that’s the other side of it. You will always make mistakes. Sourcing is hard, recruiting is hard, leadership is hard. I don’t like the word management because great people don’t need to be managed. But firing, letting go of people is hard too, but you have to do it. You’re never going to have a 100% hit rate, not even close to it. If you’re not firing, it means that you’re deluding yourself. So you do need to let people go who don’t match up, otherwise you’re only going to recruit people who are weaker than them and your company will slowly deteriorate.

Naval Ravikant: 50:06 One other side note on hiring geniuses, only hire geniuses, that’s the current motto, obviously aspirational. But you’re not trying to fill slots. You’re not trying to fill roles. That is a common trap you fall into. If they’re not a genius, don’t hire them. Just be aware as a founder of what are the rough capabilities you need and then look for geniuses who can fill those capabilities. And if you find a genius who doesn’t fill any of those capabilities but is somehow hireable, hire them right away. So collect geniuses, warehouse them, you’ll never regret it.

Naval Ravikant: 51:00 Great. You just hire them anyway if you can, regardless of whether you have a slot or not. It’s a mistake to try and fit great people into pegs and squares and triangles and holes.

Naval Ravikant: 51:11 The real geniuses are incredibly idiosyncratic. They don’t resemble each other. You cannot fit them into a box.

Naval Ravikant: 51:19 By trying to fill a role, you’re inherently trying to fit somebody into a box. So I don’t even think you necessarily want to hire for roles.

Naval Ravikant: 51:27 Yes, you want people to have skillsets that matter for your company, but good people are much more flexible than these artificial rigid boxes that we make out, which are more of a function of HR and large companies.

Naval Ravikant: 51:41 Small companies should not be applying large company practices that come from multi-hundred or multi-thousand person companies, things like HR and roles and compensation brackets and things of that nature.

Naval Ravikant: 51:54 As a founder, you’re always hacking the system, so you always have to be incredibly flexible on your feet. And when you recognize genius, just recruit them.